 "Owaisi, owaisi in lok sabha")
All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) president Asaduddin Owaisi on Thursday slammed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report after the Hindi-side petitioners claimed that a large Hindu temple existed before the construction of the Gyanvapi Masjid, located next to the Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi, citing the report.
Owaisi, referring to the organisation as a "handmaiden of Hindutva," alleged that the report was based on speculation and made a mockery of scientific study.
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Owaisi said, “This wouldn’t stand academic scrutiny before any set of professional archaeologists or historians. The report is based on conjecture and makes a mockery of scientific study. As a great scholar once said, ASI is the handmaiden of Hindutva.”
On Thursday, Vishnu Shankar Jain, the Hindu side's counsel in the Gyanvapi Masjid-Kashi Vishwanath temple issue, stated that the ASI found remnants of a large Hindu temple inside the mosque.
Jain also made the report public minutes after the 839-page document was given to the Hindu and Muslim sides, even though the court restrained both sides from revealing the details of the report in public.
“Based on the scientific studies and surveys carried out and the study of architectural remains, exposed features and artefacts, inscriptions, art, and sculptures, it can be said that there existed a Hindu temple prior to the construction of the existing structure,” the report said.
The report further suggested that the temple was destroyed during the reign of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb.
More From This Section
“The Arabic-Persian inscription found inside a room mentions that the mosque was built in the 20th regnal year of Aurangzeb... Hence, the pre-existing structure appears to have been destroyed in the 17th century, during the reign of Aurangzeb, and part of it was modified and reused in the existing structure,” said the report.
It further added that pillars decorated with bells, niches for keeping lamps, and inscriptions of the temple were reused to build the mosque.
“Based on art and architecture, this pre-existing structure can be identified as a Hindu temple,” the ASI report said.
Meanwhile, the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, which oversees the Gyanvapi mosque, stated that it had yet to review the ASI findings.
The Gyanvapi controversy dates back decades, but in August 2021, five women filed a case in a local court claiming the right to unrestricted worship at the Maa Shringar Gauri Sthal, which is located within the complex that houses idols of Hindu gods.
The ASI carried out the controversial survey of the Gyanvapi mosque after the district court passed an order for the survey to determine whether the mosque was constructed over a pre-existing structure of a Hindu temple in July last year.
The Hindu side claimed the 17th-century mosque was built on top of an existing temple and that a shivling was found in the final hours of the exercise, while the Muslim side claimed the structure was a ceremonial ablution fountain. The area remains sealed under the orders of the Supreme Court.
