 "indian economy, exports, imports, trade deficit")
Snapping the trend of growth in three consecutive months, goods exports in March year-on-year (Y-o-Y) contracted a moderate 0.67 per cent to $41.68 billion due to falling commodity prices and persistent geopolitical challenges.
With March being the seventh month when exports contracted in 2023-24, on a cumulative basis outbound shipments saw a 3.11 per cent decline at $437.06 billion, the data released by the commerce department on Monday showed.
The contraction came after exports grew during the last two financial years.
However, Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal exuded optimism and said exports had moved into a “positive cycle of growth”, particularly in the calendar year 2024.
“This year was extremely difficult for trade. The Russia-Ukraine war continues, and other conflicts came up. There was a huge issue due to the Red Sea (crisis) and Panama Canal. There were recessionary trends as well … We have beaten all odds,” Barthwal said.
The commerce secretary said that sectors such as electronic goods, drugs, and pharmaceuticals had done well despite adversities.
The commerce secretary said that sectors such as electronic goods, drugs, and pharmaceuticals had done well despite adversities.
More From This Section
Even though exports contracted in March, their value in the month was the highest in FY24. According to the data, the trade deficit in March fell to an 11-month low of $15.6 billion because imports declined at a faster pace than exports did.
On a cumulative basis, the trade deficit narrowed from $265 billion in FY23 to $240 billion in FY24.
According to Barthwal, this narrowing was due mainly to the steps taken by the government to curb non-essential imports, as well as import substitution.
In March, India imported goods worth $57.28 billion, down nearly 6 per cent mainly on the back of lower imports of items such as coal, petroleum products, gold, and fertilisers. On a cumulative basis, growth in imports was 5.41 per cent at $677.24 billion during FY24, the data showed.
Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at Bank of Baroda, said the decline in imports in FY24 could be attributed to lower oil imports, which went down 14.1 per cent, supported by reduced oil prices.
“On the other hand, gold imports surged 30.1 per cent in FY24, compared with a decline of 24.2 per cent in FY23 as it became an attractive investment option,” Sabnavis said.
Aditi Nayar, chief economist and head of research and outreach, ICRA, said led by a larger Y-o-Y decline in merchandise imports vis-à-vis such exports, India’s merchandise trade deficit eased to an 11-month low in March, while also trailing the levels seen in the year-ago month, amid a halving of gold imports and a fall in non-oil non-gold imports.
“This is expected to augur well for the current account number in Q4FY24, which may witness a small, transient surplus of $1-2 billion in the quarter,” Nayar said.
Services exports saw a 6.25 per cent contraction at $28.54 billion in March, while that of imports saw 6.57 per cent decline to $15.84 billion, resulting in a surplus of $12.69 billion. The services trade data for January, however, is an “estimate”, which will be revised based on the Reserve Bank of India’s subsequent release.
India’s overall exports -- goods and services -- saw only 0.04 per cent growth at $776.68 billion in FY24.
“For FY25, we expect a further recovery in both goods as well as services exports as the global economy recovers. Import growth is also expected to be steady as domestic demand picks up. Global commodity prices have remained largely stable so far. However, risks remain from escalation in geopolitical conflicts as well as a recovery in China’s growth outlook,” Sabnavis added.
Federation of Indian Export Organisations President Ashwani Kumar said the tensions in West Asia, especially the threat for consignments routing through the Red Sea, had added to the woes of the exporting community, because the freight rates, along with the insurance cost, had gone up “unimaginably high”, with the burden of various surcharge.
Much will depend on the new contracts to be signed with buyers in the new financial year because the exporters have been absorbing the burden of increased freight cost in accordance with the old agreement.
