Business Standard

Bank bound to honour bearer cheque

The National Commission pointed out that by issuing a "self" cheque payable to "bearer", Susheel had relinquished the right to question its encashmentc

cheques, cheque bounce, banking, payments
Premium

Jehangir B Gai

Listen to This Article

Susheel Thakur had issued cheque number 090232 dated September 13, 2005, for Rs 2.7 lakh to his mother. It was made payable to “self or bearer” and sent through post but was lost in transit. After issuing stop payment instructions, Thakur issued cheque number 090233 dated October 13, 2005, for the same amount. This cheque also met the same fate as the previous one.
 
Thakur then issued cheque number 090234 dated October 19, 2005, for the same amount, which was encashed on November 8, 2005. When Thakur learnt that the encashment was not done by his mother, but by some
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper

What you get on BS Premium?

  • Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
  • Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
  • Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
  • Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
  • Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
VIEW ALL FAQs

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in