By Cade Metz, Cecilia Kang, Sheera Frenkel, Stuart A Thompson & Nico Grant
In late 2021, OpenAI faced a supply problem. The artificial intelligence lab exhausted every reservoir of reputable English-language text on the internet as it developed its latest AI system. It needed more data to train the next version of its technology — lots more. So OpenAI researchers created a speech recognition tool called Whisper.
In late 2021, OpenAI faced a supply problem. The artificial intelligence lab exhausted every reservoir of reputable English-language text on the internet as it developed its latest AI system. It needed more data to train the next version of its technology — lots more. So OpenAI researchers created a speech recognition tool called Whisper.
It could transcribe the audio from YouTube videos, yielding new conversational text that would make an AI system smarter. Some OpenAI employees discussed how such a move might go against YouTube’s rules, three people with knowledge of the conversations said.
YouTube, which is owned by Google, prohibits use of its videos for applications that are “independent” of the video platform.
Ultimately, an OpenAI team transcribed more than one million hours of YouTube videos, the people said. The team included Greg Brockman, OpenAI’s president, who personally helped collect the videos, two of the people said.
The texts were then fed into a system called GPT-4, which was widely considered one of the world’s most powerful AI models and was the basis of the latest version of the ChatGPT chatbot. The race to lead AI has become a desperate hunt for the digital data needed to advance the technology.
More From This Section
To obtain that data, tech companies including OpenAI, Google and Meta have cut corners, ignored corporate policies and debated bending the law, according to an examination by The New York Times.
At Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, managers, lawyers and engineers last year discussed buying the publishing house Simon & Schuster to procure long works, according to recordings of internal meetings obtained by The Times. They also conferred on gathering copyrighted data from across the internet, even if that meant facing lawsuits. Negotiating licenses with publishers, artists, musicians and the news industry would take too long, they said.
Like OpenAI, Google transcribed YouTube videos to harvest text for its AI models, five people with knowledge of the company’s practices said.
That potentially violated the copyrights to the videos.
Last year, Google also broadened its terms of service. One motivation for the change, according to members of the company’s privacy team and an internal message viewed by The Times, was to allow Google to be able to tap publicly available Google Docs, restaurant reviews on Google Maps and other online material for more of its AI products.
The companies’ actions illustrate how online information — news stories, fictional works, message board posts, Wikipedia articles, computer programmes, photos, podcasts and movie clips — has increasingly become the lifeblood of the booming AI industry.
Creating innovative systems depends on having enough data to teach the technologies to instantly produce text, images, sounds and videos that resemble what a human creates. The most prized data, AI researchers said, is high-quality information, such as published books and articles, which have been carefully written and edited by professionals. For years, the internet — with sites like Wikipedia and Reddit — was a seemingly endless source of data. But as AI advanced, tech firms sought more repositories. Google and Meta, which have billions of users who produce search queries and social media posts every day, were limited by privacy laws and their policies from drawing on much of that content for AI.
Tech companies could run through high-quality data on the internet by 2026, according to Epoch, a research institute. The firms are using data faster than it is being produced. “The only practical way for these tools to exist is if they can be trained on massive amounts of data without having to license it,” Sy Damle, a lawyer who represents Andreessen Horowitz, a Silicon Valley venture capital firm, said of AI models last year.
©2024 The New York Times News