The Supreme Court said on Monday contesting parties cannot directly approach it and seek dissolution of marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown by filing a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. A five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice S K Kaul, while referring to a top court verdict delivered earlier by a two-judge bench, said it was rightly held that any such attempt must be spurned and not accepted, as the parties should not be permitted to file a writ petition under Article 32 before the top court or under Article 226 before the high court seeking divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The reason is that the remedy of a person aggrieved by the decision of the competent judicial forum is to approach the superior tribunal/forum for redressal of his/her grievance. The parties should not be permitted to circumvent the procedure by resorting to the writ jurisdiction under Article 32 or 226 of the Constitution of India, as the case
The Supreme Court on Monday held that it can dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown. A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice S K Kaul said the apex court is empowered under Article 142 of the Constitution to do complete justice. Article 142 of the Constitution deals with the enforcement of decrees and orders of the apex court to do "complete justice" in any matter pending before it. "We have. held that it is possible for this court to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage," the bench, also comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna, A S Oka, Vikram Nath and J K Maheshwari, said. The apex court delivered the verdict on a batch of petitions relating to the exercise of its vast powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve broken-down marriages between consenting couples without referring them to family courts for protracted judicial proceedings to get the decree of separation.
Article in Forbes magazine says he wife and their special needs son in the US
Amazon owner Jeff Bezos' former wife MacKenzie Scott has filed for divorce from her second husband, Dan Jewett, two years after they got married
In its recent judgement, a division bench of Justices Alok Aradhe and J M Khazi held that husband treating wife as 'cash cow' amounts to cruelty
Brin's earlier marriage to 23andMe co-founder Anne Wojcicki ended in divorce in 2015
Brin filed a petition for dissolution of his marriage to Nicole Shanahan this month, citing "irreconcilable differences," according to court documents
Simply put, alimony is a monetary compensation granted to a spouse who is unable to support himself/herself.
The judge directed Mohammed to make a one-off payment of 251.5 million pounds within three months to Haya.
London's divorce courts have been a popular destination for high-value legal fights
Khan and Dabi are UPSC toppers of 2015
From conservative to radical, the party's stand on marriage and population control has evolved in two distinct phases: One when it was in power, another when it was not
Bollywood actor Aamir Khan and producer Kiran Rao announced their separation on Saturday. The couple, who has been married for 15 years, share a son Azad Rao Khan together
Gates's reluctance to take decisive action at Cascade goes against the image he created of a philanthropist and champion of women's empowerment.
Luna is the largest and most expensive single asset held by companies linked to oil and gas tycoon Farkhad Akhmedov.
The couple's net worth is estimated to be more than $124 billion, and includes assets as varied as real estate and rare artefacts.
The couple have said that they plan on remaining co-chairs and trustees of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Bill and Melinda Gates have promised to donate most of their wealth to charity, but their divorce would be the largest splitting of assets
A survey conducted by the All-China Women's Federation in 2011 showed that about one in four women had suffered physical or verbal abuse, or had their freedoms restricted by their partners
The Gauhati High Court observed that the woman's refusal to wear shaka (conch shell bangle) and sindoor (vermillion) amounted to her refusal to accept the marriage