Page 3 - Securities Appellate Tribunal

SAT stays Sebi's order restraining IIFL Securities from taking new clients

In an interim relief to IIFL Securities, the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has stayed market regulator Sebi's order that banned the broking house from onboarding new clients for two years. The order came after IIFL Securities, earlier known as India Infoline Ltd, filed an appeal against the order passed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). In an order uploaded on its website on Wednesday, the appellate tribunal has stayed the order passed by Sebi. The matter has been listed for final disposal on August 23. The capital markets regulator, on June 19, prohibited IIFL Securities from taking up new clients for two years for alleged mis-utilisation of client funds. In its order, Sebi found that IIFL failed to segregate its own funds from clients' funds, misused the funds of its credit balance clients for settlement of its proprietary trades as well as the trades of its debit balance clients from April 2011 to June 2014, and the said violations were again noticed .

LIVE: Supertech promotor RK Arora arrested by ED in money laundering case

Catch all the latest updates from across the globe here

SAT reserves order on Zee Promoter's appeal in fund diversion case

Tribunal will soon pronounce if the bar on Chandra & Goenka from holding key positions can be lifted

LIVE: Wagner head releases 11-min audio in 1st message since halting mutiny

Catch all the latest updates from across the globe here

SAT adjourns Zee Entertainment-Sebi matter; next hearing on Tuesday

Refuses to take on record additional affidavit filed by Sebi in the matter

Top headlines: Byju's sacks staff, Zee Ent terms Sebi's order unjustified

Business Standard brings you the top headlines at this hour

SAT to take up Zee Ent promoter plea against Sebi order on June 15

'Principles of natural justice' not followed, say legal representatives

SAT quashes 'unjustified' Sebi order nixing Brickwork Ratings licence

Directs regulator to issue fresh order on penalty while upholding certain violations

SAT stays ban on Samir Jain, wife, and six others in PNB Finance case

In two separate orders, Sebi alleged that PNBFIL and CCIL did not make adequate disclosures about their promoter entities

SAT reduces Sebi's penalty on former Maars Software MD to Rs 10 lakh

The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has slashed the penalty imposed on the former MD of Maars Software International to Rs 10 lakh from Rs 1 crore in a case related to manipulation in the issuance of global depository receipts. Maars Software International Ltd (MSIL) came out with a global depository receipts (GDRs) issue on August 10, 2007. Pravin Champalal Jain was the former managing director of MSIL. "While affirming the order of Sebi's Adjudicating Officer (AO) for the violations committed by the company, we reduce the penalty from Rs 1 crore to Rs 10 lakhs. "In our opinion, the penalty imposed is excessive and disproportionate to the violation and is also discriminatory," the tribunal said in its ruling on Tuesday. The verdict came after Jain challenged the order passed by Sebi in July 2020. Sebi's AO had imposed Rs 10.25 crore on MSIL, Rs 1 crore on Jain and Rs 10 lakh each on Harshawardhan S Rathore and Nikunj Babulal Choradiya for flouting Prohibition of Fraudulent a

SAT reserves Sebi order against Arshad Warsi in pump-and-dump case

The regulator had barred the actor and his wife for manipulation of Sadhna Broadcast shares via YouTube videos

Reconsider Satyam order: Securities Appellate Tribunal to Sebi

Regulator had fined Ramalinga Raju, others and banned them from market for 14 yrs

Latest SAT relief colocation matter to free up Rs 1,000 cr for NSE

Tribunal prunes penalty on bourse from Rs 1,100 cr to just Rs 100 cr; Sebi told to refund excess amount in six weeks along with interest

Deficient regulation

Sebi needs capacity to protect investor interests

NSE, ex-chiefs Ramkrishna, Narain get SAT relief in colocation case

Tribunal directs NSE to pay Rs 100 crore penalty for failing to follow due diligence. Legal representatives said that findings against NSE have been partially set aside

SAT sets aside Sebi's order to impose penalty on Bhushan Steel for lapses

The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has set aside a Sebi's order to impose a Rs 2 lakh penalty on Bhushan Steel Ltd, now known as Tata Steel BSL Ltd, for disclosure lapses. Bankruptcy proceedings were initiated against the debt-laden Bhushan Steel Ltd in July 2017. After completing the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP), Bhushan Steel was taken over by Tata Steel Ltd in 2018. "The impugned order dated 14 February 2022, cannot be sustained and is quashed. However, it would be open to the respondent Sebi to issue a show cause notice for the alleged violation against the entity," SAT said in an order passed on December 20. The ruling comes after an appeal was filed against the Sebi order, levying a Rs 2 lakh fine on Bhushan Steel for not making the requisite disclosure under LODR (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) rules. It noted that the appellant was found guilty of non-disclosure of the number of investor complaints filed with the stock exchanges on a

NSEL scam: Sebi bans five major commodity brokers for six months

The brokers had appealed to the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) against a previous order by Sebi issued in 2019

Bombay Dyeing moves SAT against Sebi's Rs 2.25 cr fine, two-year market ban

Sebi had passed the order on the firm, its promoter Nusli N Wadia, and three others for allegedly inflating financial statements; firm responded saying its accounting practice was wrongly interpreted

Analysts positive on Bank Nifty, advise picking up stocks on dips

Bank Nifty index has been outperforming the benchmark Nifty. It has gained 4% in the past one month and 16% YTD. In comparison, Nifty is up less than 2% both on a one-month and YTD basis

Wadias, BDMCL likely to file appeal before SAT against Sebi order

Sebi has charged the violators under the Prevention of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Regulations for alleged misrepresentation of financial statements