Subramaniam Swamy

HC seeks Maha govt response on Swamy's PIL against Pandharpur Temples Act

The Bombay High Court on Monday sought the Maharashtra government's reply on a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy challenging the Pandharpur Temples Act. In the petition filed in February this year, Swamy claimed the Maharashtra government had taken over the administration of the Pandharpur town's temples in an arbitrary manner. A division bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Arif S Doctor on Monday directed the government to file its affidavit and posted the matter for hearing on September 13. As per the plea, the state government through the Pandharpur Temples Act, 1973, had abolished all hereditary rights and privileges of ministrants and priestly classes for the governance and administration of the temples of Lord Vitthal and Rukmini in Pandharpur in the state's Solapur district. The law enabled the state government to control its administration and management of funds, the plea said. On Monday, another person Bheemach

Subramanian Swamy moves Delhi HC over Centre's failure to provide security

Former BJP MP Subramanian Swamy approached the Delhi High Court on Thursday, stating that in spite of an earlier assurance, the Centre has not made any security arrangements at the accommodation he would be residing in after vacating the government-allotted bungalow. Swamy, a "Z" category protectee whose term as a Rajya Sabha member ended in April, had earlier moved the court for re-allotment of the government bungalow, citing security threats to him. On Thursday, his counsel mentioned the issue of providing adequate security at his private residence before a bench headed by Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, which agreed to list it for hearing on October 31. Representing Swamy, senior advocate Jayant Mehta told the court that when a single-judge bench of the court had granted six weeks' time to the former MP to vacate the bungalow, the Centre had given an assurance that adequate security arrangements would be made at his place of stay. "None (security arrangements) have been don

Conditional autonomy

IIM-A controversy shows the limits to freedom of action

Why Shramik Special Trains have created a political storm

Here's why the Shramik Special Trains have created quite a stir in political circles

MP's governor Lalji Tandon must wait before moving to official residence

He has to wait because the former governor of the state, Anandiben Patel, who is now governor of Uttar Pradesh, is yet to move out

Never asked PM Modi for any cabinet berth: Subramanian Swamy

Jurist Fali S Nariman said that it was perhaps because Swamy was too forthright

Najeeb Jung 'unsuited' for LG's job: Subramaniam Swamy

Swamy, however gave no specific reason or seeking Jung's ouster